We are currently in the final week of a three week unit looking at measuring student growth in my VanderCook MECA class entitled Teaching Music in a Common Core World. Our assignment over the past two weeks has been to develop two Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a means of measuring student growth as part of our teacher evaluation. This post contains the second of my two SLOs as well as a comparison between Illinois' requirements for an SLO and my district's (Ankeny, Iowa) requirements for our Individual Teacher Professional Development Plan (ITPDP).
Student Learning Objective #2
Due to privacy laws, I am not permitted to post the data referenced in Elements 3 and 4.
Comparing SLOs to ITPDPs
In a previous post, I describe how the teacher evaluation system works in my district in Ankeny, Iowa. To briefly summarize, our Professional Growth Model occurs over a three year period and revolves around our Individual Teacher Professional Development Plan (ITPDP). Within our ITPDP, we identify individual goals for our students' academic achievement and behavior achievement. These goals may be the same as our Professional Learning Community's goal(s). All of these goals are aligned with building goals, include 2-5 Danielson components, and connect with the Iowa Teaching Standards. The Professional Growth Model also includes peer review, collecting evidence for the Department of Education, 8 informal walkthroughs, 6 annual conferences to review the ITPDP, and 1 formal observation with a pre- and post-observation conference. At this time, the state of Iowa does not require student growth to be included in a teacher's evaluation.
While developing these two SLOs, I found that our ITPDPs are quite similar to the expectations the state of Illinois has for measuring student growth.
|Illinois SLO||Ankeny ITPDP|
|Element 1: Learning Goal - description of what students will be able to do at the end of a specified period of time aligned to appropriate learning standards. Learning goals include one big idea that integrates multiple content standards, and links units of instruction together. The big idea chosen should be representative of the most important learning and typical student growth in a specific content area, grade level, or classroom.||Individual Teacher Academic/Behavior Goal - identify goals as an individual teacher for student academic and behavior achievement. These goals may be shared with the PLC Team Goal.|
|Element 2: Assessments and Scoring - describe the assessments and scoring procedures that measure students’ understanding of the learning goal. Data should be formatively collected prior to and throughout the unit of instruction and summatively at the completion of the unit of instruction. It is recommended to use rubrics to score assessments.||Indicators of Progress - determine how teacher will measure students progress towards achievement of the Academic/Behavior Goals. Document the effect of each of the chosen indicators.|
|Element 3: Growth Targets - determine goals for individual student or groups of students growth.
||Individual Teacher Academic/Behavior Goal - All goals must be SMART:
|Element 4: Growth Targets - document how many students meet their growth targets. This step is discussed during Step 6, final review, of the SLO Cycle.||Indicators of Progress - final indicators should determine if students met the Academic or Behavior goals.|
|Element 5: Teacher Rating - This portion of determining a teacher rating based on the SLO is still being developed by the ISBE. Illinois’ goal is that student growth will represent 25-30% of a teacher’s performance evaluation.||There is not currently a formal teacher rating in the Ankeny system. An Integrity Checklist is provided to HR documenting the completion of the various elements of the ITPDP, Danielson components, and Iowa Teaching Standards. A summative evaluation form is submitted to the Iowa Department of Education regarding evidence of the teacher meeting all of the Iowa Teaching Standards.|
|Danielson Components are linked to the various SLO Elements:
||Teachers select 2-5 Danielson Components aligned with the Individual Teacher Academic and Behavior Goals for administrators to provide formative feedback on during informal observations.|
||While Ankeny does not have specific steps, many parts of the Professional Growth Model correlate. Teachers in Ankeny must: